In a bizarre segment, a transgender 'personality' who previously wanted to be a "human Ken doll" before deciding to become a 'woman', lectured JK Rowling on what being female really means, declaring that the author should "stick to what she knows." Report: https://t.co/K06cu2wjbTpic.twitter.com/fHcFCrS9sY
dailymail | Doritos is being slammed as the new Bud Light
after hiring a trans influencer as a 'brand ambassador' despite the
activist appearing to promote child sexual abuse in the past.
Spanish
native Samantha Hudson - whose real name is Iván González Ranedo - is a
singer and activist with over 30,000 subscribers to her YouTube channel. Her partnership with Doritos Spain, run by PepsiCo Spain, was recently announced.
Hudson,
24, has identified herself as 'anti-capitalist' and 'Marxist' in
interviews, released a song critical of the Catholic Church and even
said in one video that she is for 'the abolition of [and to] destroy and
annihilate the traditional monogamous nuclear family.'
As a teen, she has also tweeted about wanting to do 'thuggish things' to a minor.
The
partnership between Hudson and Doritos was quickly blasted online and
many made reference to Bud Light's disastrous partnership with trans
influencer Dylan Mulvaney - which saw Budweiser lose $1.4 billion in sales as a result.
The Daily Caller posted a screenshot of a
tweet she allegedly made in 2015, when Hudson was 15, writing in Spanish
about the seeming assault of a minor.
Another
alleged post translates to: 'In the middle of the street in Mallorca in
panties and screaming that I’m a nymphomaniac in front of a super
beautiful 8-year-old girl.'
According to Newsweek,
she has also been accused of mocking sexual assault victims, though
Hudson herself has claimed she was sexually abused as a teenager in a 2023 interview.
Hudson's new partnership with Doritos was announced through a 50-second video called 'Crunch Talks.'
'Doritos is about to get the Bud Light treatment,' wrote one user on X, formerly Twitter.
Another
wrote: 'Just make flavored tortilla chips. You don't need to have a
stance on anything other than that. It's not tricky.'
'Why
are brands like Doritos being so self-destructive? Have they learned
nothing from the Budweiser snafu? Let me guess, their advertising
division is headed by a DEI hire?'
DailyMail.com has reached out to PepsiCo and Frito Lay for comment.
NYPost | A Georgia district attorney accused of hiring her lover
to prosecute former President Trump broke her silence on the
controversy, saying she and the prosecutor were targeted because they
are black.
The comments were Willis’ first time addressing the allegations
publicly — but she neither confirmed nor denied the claims lobbed at her
and special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who helped secure an indictment
against the former Republican president in an election interference
case.
“They only attacked one,” Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis
Sunday at Big Bethel AME Church in Atlanta. “First thing they say, ‘Oh,
she’s gonna play the race card now.’
“But no God, isn’t it them that’s playing the race card when they only question one?”
She called Wade “a great friend and a great lawyer,” along with a
“superstar,” but failed to mention him by name once during her more than
30 minute speech, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
The pair were accused by Trump co-defendant Michael Roman of having a
“clandestine” and “improper” affair when appointments were made for the
2020 election interference case.
Roman, a former official on the Trump 2020 campaign, argued in a
court filing last week that the integrity of the case had been
compromised by their alleged affair and asked that all charges against
him be dropped.
“The district attorney chose to appoint her romantic partner, who at
all times relevant to this prosecution has been a married man,” the
filing read.
Roman contended in the filing that Wade used some of the $654,000 in
legal fees he’d earned on the case to take Willis on vacations to “Napa
Valley, California, Florida and the Caribbean.”
Willis pointed out during her speech that the other two prosecutors
assigned to the case, Anna Green Cross and John Floyd, both are white,
and noted that allegations have only emerged targeting the two prominent
black members of the prosecution — her and Wade.
“Isn’t it them playing the race card when they constantly think I
need someone from some other jurisdiction in some other state to tell me
how to do a job I’ve been doing almost 30 years?” she asked.
Roman was unmoved by Willis accusations of the charges being racially charged.
yahoo | Hundreds of sealed court filings pertaining to the late sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein are set to be made public
this week, and several prominent names -- including Britain's Prince
Andrew and former President Bill Clinton -- are expected to appear in
the documents.
U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled earlier
this month there was no legal justification for continuing to conceal
the ex-president's name and more than 150 names other "John and Jane
Does" mentioned in the records. Preska ordered the unsealing to begin
after Jan. 1.
The documents stem from a 2015 civil lawsuit
centered on allegations that Epstein's one-time paramour, Ghislaine
Maxwell, facilitated the sexual abuse of Virginia Giuffre, an alleged
trafficking victim. Giuffre also accused Epstein and Maxwell of
directing her to have sex with Prince Andrew and several other prominent
men. Prince Andrew denied the allegations and claimed he could not recall ever meeting Giuffre. He later settled a lawsuit she filed against him.
Most
of the prominent names that appear in the documents are already
associated in some way with Epstein; for allegations of wrongdoing, for
having worked for Epstein, flown on his planes, or visited his homes.
Some were mentioned during Maxwell's criminal trial in 2021. In some
instances, the only appearances of the names are in potential witness
lists or in proposed terms for searches of electronic records.
While Giuffre's allegations against Prince Andrew, and his denials,
have been widely reported around the globe, dozens of the sealed records
are expected to contain additional details from "Jane Doe 162," a
witness who testified she was with Prince Andrew, Maxwell and Giuffre,
then 17, at Epstein's New York mansion. Giuffre has alleged that
gathering, in 2001, was one of the occasions she was directed to have
sex with Andrew.
Giuffre made no allegations of wrongdoing by
Clinton, and there is no indication the sealed records contain evidence
of illegal conduct by Clinton. But Giuffre's claim that she met the
ex-president on Epstein's private Caribbean island emerged as a
contentious issue in the litigation, which was settled in 2017. Maxwell
contended Clinton had never been to Little St. James -- as Epstein's
island was known -- and assailed Giuffre's claim as a fabrication that
shattered her credibility.
Personal flight logs kept by one of
Epstein's pilots -- which surfaced in separate lawsuits against Epstein
-- showed that Clinton and his entourage had flown extensively on
Epstein's jumbo-jet to international destinations such as Paris, Bangkok
and Brunei in 2002 and 2003. But none of the available records included
the former president on a trip to Epstein's island.
The court
documents to be unsealed this week represent the eighth, and likely
final, round of unsealing records from the case since the Miami Herald
intervened for access to the records in 2018. Previously unsealed items
included multiple deposition transcripts of Maxwell and Giuffre, along
with sworn, but unproven, allegations that Epstein and Maxwell directed
Giuffre to have sex with several well-known men, including former Senate
Majority Leader George Mitchell, the late model scout Jean Luc Brunel,
billionaire hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin, and others.
Maxwell denied the allegations, as did all of the men identified by Giuffre when their names surfaced.
This
batch will involve the names of additional Epstein associates, alleged
perpetrators, alleged co-conspirators, alleged victims, witnesses and
former Epstein employees. Several of the "Does" mentioned in the
documents are now deceased.
Former President Clinton, who ABC News
has learned is identified as "Doe 36," is mentioned in more than fifty
of the redacted filings, according to court records. Several of those
sealed or redacted entries are focused on an effort by Giuffre's lawyers
in mid-2016, first reported by ABC News, to subpoena the two-term Democratic president for deposition testimony about his relationship with Epstein.
.@RobertKennedyJr talks to Russell Brand about how the NSA was in charge of Operation Warp Speed, the history of the United States bioweapons program, and why Anthony Fauci is the highest-paid government official in history:
In a statement on Tuesday, YouTube said they took action against Brand’s account — which has 6.6 million subscribers
— to “protect” users in light of “serious allegations against the
creator.” It means 48-year-old Brand will no longer be able to profit
from the ads that run within and alongside his videos, which have titles
like “What REALLY Started the Hawaii Fires?” and “Covid Tsar Admits
Lockdowns Were NEVER About Science.”
“This decision applies to all channels that may be owned or operated by Russell Brand,” the Google-owned video service said.
While Brand has not been charged with any crimes, YouTube said he violated its “creator responsibility policy.”
“If a creator’s off-platform behavior harms our users, employees or
ecosystem, we take action to protect the community,” the statement read.
BBC echoed the sentiment, saying Brand’s content “now falls below public expectations” of iPlayer and BBC Sounds.
Over the weekend, the Times of London, The Sunday Times and Channel 4 Dispatches published a joint investigation in which several women accused Brand of sexual assault and rape between 2006 and 2013 — a period during which Brand also became married to and subsequently divorced from pop star Katy Perry.
theintercept | On Tuesday evening, Ross Coulthart, an Australian independent journalist who covers UFOs and has interviewed Grusch, posted a statement attributed to Grusch on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
“It has come to my attention that The Intercept intends to
publish an article about two incidents in 2014 and 2018 that highlights
previous personal struggles I had with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD), Grief and Depression,” the statement reads. “As I stated under
oath in my congressional testimony, over 40 credentialed intelligence
and military personnel provided myself and my colleagues the information
I transmitted to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG)
and I took the leadership role to represent the concerns of these
distinguished and patriotic individuals.”
Grusch’s wife, Jessica Grusch, did not respond to several requests for comment.
A former colleague of Grusch’s expressed shock that he retained his
clearance after the 2014 incident, which was also documented in public
records obtained by The Intercept.
“I think it’s like any insular group: Once you’re in, they generally
protect their own,” said the former colleague, who asked not to be named
because they feared professional reprisals.
The former colleague said that the 2014 incident was known to
Grusch’s superiors, a claim that Coulthart appeared to confirm in an
interview on NewsNation, a subscription television network owned by
Nexstar Media.
“The intelligence community and the Defense Department clearly
accepted there was no issue because he was allowed to keep his security
clearance,” Coulthart told Chris Cuomo Tuesday night.
Two Republican members of the House Oversight Committee, Reps. Anna
Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett, were tasked with organizing the July 26
hearing after Grusch’s whistleblower claims became public. Not all House
Republicans are supportive of the effort. Rep. Mike Turner, chair of
the House Intelligence Committee, has taken a dim view of Grusch’s
claims.
“Every decade there’s been individuals who’ve said the United States
has such pieces of unidentified flying objects that are from outer
space,” Turner said.
“There’s no evidence of this and certainly it would be quite a
conspiracy for this to be maintained, especially at this level.”
Grusch emerged as the hearing’s star witness, but his evidence was largely secondhand: When asked, Grusch said
he hasn’t seen any of the recovered alien vehicles or bodies himself.
While two former Navy fighter pilots alleged unidentified aerial
phenomena, neither said anything about their provenance. Grusch was alone among the witnesses in attributing them to extraterrestrials.
“My testimony is based on information I have been given by
individuals with a longstanding track record of legitimacy,” Grusch said
in his opening statement.
Shortly after The Intercept reached out to Grusch for comment for
this story, Coulthart went on Cuomo’s show and said that The Intercept
was planning to publish “confidential medical records” about Grusch that
had been leaked by the intelligence community. Coulthart, an ardent
defender of Grusch, told NewsNation that “Grusch believes the government
may now be behind an effort to release his medical records in an effort
to smear his credibility.”
“This is a document that would be, if the media had done the right
thing, it would be in his police department file, in the file in the
county sheriff’s office,” Coulthart said in his interview with Cuomo.
“But Dave has checked today, because he assumed that the journalist had
done his homework and just asked the local sheriff for the files. The
sheriff has confirmed it did not come from him. The only other place
that had this information is the intelligence community, Dave’s personal
files inside the intelligence community, where quite properly, when
anybody is security assist, things like this have to be looked at, and
somebody inside the intelligence community leaked it.”
Coulthart went on to compare the purported leak to Richard Nixon’s
attempts to discredit Daniel Ellsberg, who shared the Pentagon Papers
with the New York Times.
“I think there should be an inquiry into the circumstances of how
sensitive records pertaining to a decorated combat veteran’s file found
their way to a journalist not through the proper channels,” Coulthart
said. “This could’ve been requested under FOI, as is normal, but the
county sheriff has confirmed that did not happen.”
sputnik | Tara
Reade, a US citizen, writer, and ex-assistant to Joe Biden, who has
recently arrived in Russia, told Sputnik she no longer feels safe in
Biden's America, adding that many Americans are ready to follow in her
footsteps.
Tara
Reade, a former Senate staffer, came forward in April 2020 and filed a
criminal complaint against then-presumptive Democratic presidential
hopeful Joe Biden, accusing him of sexual assault in 1993. Even though some Democratic congresswomen
said they believe her, not only were her claims downplayed by the US
mainstream press, but she was also subjected to smears, a criminal
probe, and intimidation.
After Biden's 2024 re-election announcement, Reade reiterated her accusations and expressed willingness to testify in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives. However, in early May, Tara released a cryptic message saying that if something happens to her, all roads would lead to Biden. Reade opted to come to Russia to protect her life.
On May 30, Member of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs Maria Butina, who herself fell victim to the US punitive machine,
promised to discuss the possibility of granting Russian citizenship to
Reade and ask Russian President Vladimir Putin to fast track her
citizenship request.
Tara
Reade is not the only American truth-seeker who has come to Russia in
order to evade political persecution from the US authorities. Earlier,
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden found refuge in the Russian Federation
after revealing a US global spying program which targeted American
citizens in sharp violation of the US Constitution. In September 2022,
Vladimir Putin signed a decree granting Russian citizenship to Edward.
He is now a full-fledged citizen of Russia.
As
per Reade, there are a lot of people in the US who feel unsafe. Her
message to them is to take action to protect themselves and their
families "and to really look at who you're voting for."
"We
need systemic change. So participate in that process and try to take
command of your democracy if you want a democracy, because right now
it's in disarray," Reade said, addressing her fellow Americans. "And
that's the problem. And as far as like going to another safe haven, I
mean, there are many Americans here, and I don't want to out a bunch of
Americans, but there are people here that are coming to Russia - much
like back in the day when Soviet Union people defected over to the US -
now you have the opposite. Now you have US and European citizens looking
for safe haven here. And luckily, the Kremlin is accommodating. So
we're lucky."
kunstler | Would it surprise you to learn that
children well beneath the age of puberty are not inclined to think about
sex at all? In a well-ordered society that recognizes children as
different from adults, they don’t. And if something sexual comes to
their attention, they are generally perplexed by it. Unless they’re born
into an era when adults are busy erasing boundaries, guard-rails, and
cultural inhibitions, in which case I must imagine that young children
exposed to, say, pornography in a chaotic household find it
traumatically sinister. So, why the gleeful celebration about
sexualizing children now?
I’ll tell you why: because we are living in a very badly-ordered society these days, a society in which anything goes and nothing matters,
which is a poor principle for civilization. It’s the same principle
that has people shitting all over the sidewalks of San Francisco,
looting Walgreens stores in broad daylight, pushing ineffective and
unsafe vaccines (and lying about it), and arresting people for thought
crimes. It’s a degenerate society. Morally bankrupt. Wicked.
You might ask, how did it get that way?
The concise answer is that a broken business model for daily life and a
collapsing economy have so disordered millions of minds that values are
seen as having no value. The scaffold for truth, beauty, honor,
dignity, courage, prudence, generosity, etc., folded some time ago, in
slow-motion, so we didn’t notice.
The keepers of our culture have
replaced it with a tacky system of ritual virtue-signaling fakery that
they don’t really believe in, that persists simply because the moral
vacuum it stands for provokes such unbearable anxiety. The main lesson
of the recent Durham Report — missed by even the most punctilious
observers — is that our country does not want to fix itself, indeed the
whole broken apparatus of fixing it is in the hands of the people who
broke it.
This epic negligence leaves the doors
wide open for the broad range of lower-order criminal mischief we’re
seeing expressed all around us. Now I will venture into shadowland.
There is a rumor floating around the Internet that this seemingly
coordinated campaign to sexualize children and initiate them into
marginal behaviors was started to soften up the public for forthcoming
shocking revelations contained in the much-whispered-about Jeffrey
Epstein archive of videos that show eminent international figures caught
in compromising sexual situations that include sexual acts with
children.
I wouldn’t commit to saying there’s
anything to that, but there have been an awful lot of signs and portents
pointing in that direction, and so I also wouldn’t dismiss it
altogether. There can be little doubt that the videos exist, or did
exist — we know that Epstein’s various mansions were rigged to the eaves
with cameras, and that he was an “asset” of more than one nation’s
intel service trafficking in blackmail — and I’d expect that there are
at least a few copies of the videos out there, just like there are many copies of Hunter Biden’s laptop hard-drive out there.
There’s something definitely
programmatic about the way the drag queens were rolled out into the
kiddie korners the past year. It doesn’t feel organic, shall we say, but
rather directed, like a sinister grand opera. And the effort
to enlist and initiate schoolchildren into a psychodrama of hyperbolic
sexual confusion looks absolutely orchestrated.
What we might be seeing is the
convergence of a world-beating political scandal with an economy-killing
financial crisis that will destroy the entire post-WW2 armature of
money and credit. That event would usher in a period of appalling
turbulence in our everyday life, severing supply chains, killing
businesses, and disturbing every imaginable social arrangement as well
as public order. If that comes to pass, and it’s looking likely, then
that will be the last we hear about personal pronouns and trans
influencers for a thousand years.
thecritic.co.uk |If a man seeks to humiliate a woman he encounters, nothing is easier than reducing her appearance to a mere caricature. Men do this directly in front of the woman they are targeting: lifting their voice to a squeak, exaggerating hand gestures, pushing out pretend breasts, wiggling their bum, pouting and fiddling with their hair. Most of these men confine the taunt to the woman in front of them, and
the woman often feels and displays a righteous rage. However, when it
comes to Dylan Mulvaney, the Tik Tok user who has become famous for his
grotesque parody of women, women are not supposed to react critically. They are seen as cruel or “transphobic” if they express annoyance at being so grossly insulted.
In March 2022
Dylan Mulvaney saw a way to take his barely-concealed disdain for women
up a level, with predictable success. After his career as a musical
actor had stalled due to the Covid pandemic, with people
finding solace daily on Tik Tok, wily Dylan invented a new role that
guaranteed his future wealth and success. He announced he was embarking
on a journey of “being a girl” and began a series of videos documenting
this ludicrous notion.
Women see this for the deliberately constructed misogyny it is
Shortly before this year-long, very public “transition”, Mulvaney performed a pilot video for his current lucrative act. In it he told the viewer that he “had trouble finding roles” so a friend had invented one for him, a “femme character”. His character wears a pink dress and pearls, white gloves and ankle socks. At this point Mulvaney must have
been delighted to glimpse a potential new career path. It was a very
savvy move for him to extend and develop this caricature of a 1950s
woman. Now, just over a year later, Dylan Mulvaney has highly paid “partnerships”
with a number of companies including Budweiser, Kate Spade and — during
the past week, to great objection — the Sportwear giant Nike.
In an inflammatory paid partnership video
with Nike, an inanely grinning, barefoot Mulvaney wears a Nike sports
bra and leggings. He performs a series of ridiculous moves including
comedic side stretches, a theatrical run kicking his heels up
nonsensically and failed chorus-line high kicks. He almost runs
backwards into a hedge at one point and pulls a comedy expression of
shock. It all looks ridiculous and slapstick. It mocks women by
suggesting they exercise trivially and ineffectively, but smiling throughout.
The media seems unwilling to focus on the actual reasons many women are angry about this. It has focused instead on stating that objections to the sponsorship are because Dylan is trans. This is not why women are
outraged. When a man “performs woman” in front of women to such a
humiliating degree, when he waggles and jiggles and implies that
weakness and silliness are
inherent to being a woman who plays sport, women appropriately see this
for the deliberately constructed misogyny it is. Ria Chapman, a London
PE teacher, told me why she finds this act so irritating and offensive:
Girls are still routinely bullied and mocked for being sporty and or breaking stereotypes, their achievements and ambitions not being celebrated and valued like those of their
male peers. For a sports company the size of Nike to use a male
performing a parody of what he believes women behave like during sport
only adds to the ammunition that boys will use to put girls down.
Utilising female stereotypes is the foundation of Mulvaney’s role. On his “Day 1 of being a girl” video debut, he said:
I’ve
already cried three times, written a scathing email I didn’t send,
ordered dresses online that I couldn’t afford and when someone asked me
how I was, I said “I’m fine” but I wasn’t fine. How did I do, ladies?
All of this encapsulates the
stereotype of women as emotionally fragile, frivolous spendthrifts,
imprudent around clothes and financially inept. In the stereotype Dylan
performs, women routinely suppress our emotions and focus on being
polite at all times. It is an archaic depiction of requisite female
behaviour which was seared into women’s consciousness over decades in
the past. This view of “girlhood” took further decades for feminist
women to dismantle. Dylan Mulvaney is building it back up before our
eyes and we refuse to stay quiet about it.
timesofisrael | Last week, Tablet magazine published a bombshell of an article
by Jennifer Bilek, “The Billionaire Family Pushing Synthetic Sex
Identities (SSI): The wealthy, powerful, and sometimes very weird
Pritzker cousins have set their sights on a new God-like goal: using
gender ideology to remake human biology.” Bilek argued that several
philanthropic foundations, most notably the Pritzker Family Foundation,
are funding “Synthetic Sex Identities,” referring to trans and
non-binary identities, as part of a larger “transhumanist” agenda to
alter the human body through technology. Bikel names several
foundations, some Jewish and some not, who support such an alleged
agenda.
Progressive Jewish Twitter jumped into action, as progressive
Jewish Twitter does, and condemned the article for both antisemitism and
transphobia. Yehuda Kurtzer, the head of the Hartman Institute of North
America, tweeted,
“I think the piece (which I won’t link to) was horrible, dangerous, and
antisemitic. And I’m sure there’s a way to talk about the
transformation of sex and gender in our society that’s not that.”
That Bilek names a prominent foundation run by a Jewish family
comes no where near the standard of evidence needed for labeling someone
an antisemite. Jewish groups on both sides of the ideological spectrum name
other Jewish philanthropies they don’t like all the time, and they’re
not being antisemitic. Of course, sometimes when people name Jews and
Jewish philanthropists like George Soros or the Koch Family they are
indeed dog whistling that Jews dominate the media, government,
progressive causes, rightwing causes, etc. Dog whistling is a real
thing. But that doesn’t mean every time someone cites a Jewish
philanthropy in a critical manner that they are tapping into this
antisemitic trope or that we have the needed proof to say so publicly.
Accusing someone of a dog whistle without evidence that the person is
trying to spread hatred toward Jews circumvents the usual high standard
of evidence required before attempting to destroy someone’s reputation
for being an antisemite. It’s one thing to speak of trends in
antisemitism like dog whistles—we should–it’s another to accuse someone
of a specific offense, which ought to require significant evidence.
Those who accuse Bilek of antisemitism might say that Bilek
cavorts with extreme rightwing forces. It appears she has and does.
Bilek did once question why Jews are so active in “transgenderism.” Her
full comments were:
“I just report on who the men are
(supporters of trans ideology), I don’t single them out for being Jewish
and I have never really speculated about why so many are. Quite some
time ago I came across Keith Woods’ video on his theory of why this
might be. I revisited this today because somebody wrote and asked about
the Jewish aspect of the men involved in this agenda and I found it
equally as fascinating as I did the first time. I wonder how others
might feel about this.”
The Keith Woods video she mentions does offer up some fanciful
speculation about why so many Jews are in the “transgenderism” movement.
I’d have to go through his other videos to know if he’s a dyed in the
wool antisemite but watching one was quite enough for one day. Bilek
does seem to have low standards for citing truly shadowy figures in her
writing and in some cases all out antisemites, but never spreads the
tropes herself. In reading through much of her writing and social media,
I didn’t come away with the impression that this is a woman who hates
Jews and is trying to spread Jew-hatred.
The question of Bilek being a transphobe is another matter. The
term transphobe has been so overused in condemning people who question
any aspect of gender ideology that I’m not inclined to use it. It’s been
weaponized to shut down legitimate discourse (which is why we should be
so careful in haphazardly accusing people of “antisemitism”—it dilutes
the power of the term).
Tablet | One
of the most powerful yet unremarked-upon drivers of our current wars
over definitions of gender is a concerted push by members of one of the
richest families in the United States to transition Americans from a
dimorphic definition of sex to the broad acceptance and propagation of
synthetic sex identities (SSI). Over the past decade, the Pritzkers of
Illinois, who helped put
Barack Obama in the White House and include among their number former
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker, current Illinois Gov. J.B.
Pritzker, and philanthropist Jennifer Pritzker, appear to have used a
family philanthropic apparatus to drive an ideology and practice of
disembodiment into our medical, legal, cultural, and educational
institutions.
I first wrote about the Pritzkers,
whose fortune originated in the Hyatt hotel chain, and their
philanthropy directed toward normalizing what people call
“transgenderism” in 2018. I have since stopped using the word
“transgenderism” as it has no clear boundaries,
which makes it useless for communication, and have instead opted for
the term SSI, which more clearly defines what some of the Pritzkers and
their allies are funding—even as it ignores the biological reality of
“male” and “female” and “gay” and “straight.”
The
creation and normalization of SSI speaks much more directly to what is
happening in American culture, and elsewhere, under an umbrella of human
rights. With the introduction of SSI, the current incarnation of the
LGBTQ+ network—as distinct from the prior movement that fought for equal
rights for gay and lesbian Americans, and which ended in 2020 with Bostock v. Clayton County, finding that LGBTQ+ is a protected class for discrimination purposes—is working closely with the techno-medical complex, big banks, international law firms, pharma giants, and corporate power
to solidify the idea that humans are not a sexually dimorphic
species—which contradicts reality and the fundamental premises not only
of “traditional” religions but of the gay and lesbian civil rights
movements and much of the feminist movement, for which sexual dimorphism
and resulting gender differences are foundational premises.
Through investments in the techno-medical complex, where new highly medicalized sex identities are being conjured,
Pritzkers and other elite donors are attempting to normalize the idea
that human reproductive sex exists on a spectrum. These investments go
toward creating new SSI using surgeries and drugs, and by instituting
rapid language reforms to prop up these new identities and induce
institutions and individuals to normalize them. In 2018, for example, at
the Ronald Reagan Medical Center at the University of California Los
Angeles (where the Pritzkers are major donors and hold various titles),
the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology advertised several options
for young females who think they can be men to have their reproductive organs removed, a procedure termed “gender-affirming care.”
The
Pritzkers became the first American family to have a medical school
bear its name in recognition of a private donation when it gave $12
million to the University of Chicago School of Medicine in 1968. In June 2002,
the family announced an additional gift of $30 million to be invested
in the University of Chicago’s Biological Sciences Division and School
of Medicine. These investments provided the family with a bridgehead
into the world of academic medicine, which it has since expanded in
pursuit of a well-defined agenda centered around SSI. Also in 2002,
Jennifer Pritzker founded the Tawani Foundation, which has since provided funding to Howard Brown Health and Rush Memorial Medical Center in Chicago, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Foundation Fund, and the University of Minnesota’s Institute for Sexual and Gender Health,
all of which provide some version of “gender care.” In the case of the
latter, “clients” include “gender creative children as well as
transgender and gender non-conforming adolescents ...”
In 2012, J.B. Pritzker and his wife, M.K. Pritzker, worked with The Bridgespan Group—a management consultant to nonprofits and philanthropists—to develop a long-term strategy for the J.B and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation.
Their work together included conducting research on developments in the
field of early childhood education, to which the foundation committed
$25 million.
Ever
since, a motivating and driving force behind the Pritzkers’ familywide
commitment to SSI has been J.B.’s cousin Jennifer (born James)
Pritzker—a retired lieutenant colonel in the Illinois Army National
Guard and the father of three children. In 2013, around the time gender
ideology reached the level of mainstream American culture, Jennifer
Pritzker announced a transition to womanhood. Since then, Pritzker has
used the Tawani Foundation to help fund
various institutions that support the concept of a spectrum of human
sexes, including the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, the Williams
Institute UCLA School of Law, the National Center for Transgender
Equality, the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, the American
Civil Liberties Union, the Palm Military Center, the World Professional
Association of Transgender Health (WPATH), and many others. Tawani
Enterprises, the private investment counterpart to the philanthropic
foundation, invests in and partners with Squadron Capital LLC, a Chicago-based private investment vehicle that acquires a number of medical device companies
that manufacture instruments, implants, cutting tools, and injection
molded plastic products for use in surgeries. As in the case of Jon
Stryker, founder of the LGBT mega-NGO Arcus Foundation,
it is hard to avoid the impression of complementarity between Jennifer
Pritzker’s for-profit medical investments and philanthropic support for
SSI.
Pritzker
also helps fund the University of Minnesota National Center for Gender
Spectrum Health, which claims “the gender spectrum is inclusive of the
wide array of gender identities beyond binary definitions of
gender—inclusive of cisgender and transgender identities, gender queer,
and nonbinary identities as a normal part of the natural expression of
gender. Gender spectrum health is the healthy, affirmed, positive
development of a gender identity and expression that is congruent with
the individual’s sense of self.” The university, where Pritzker has served on the Leadership Council for the Program in Human Sexuality, provides “young adult gender services” in the medical school’s Institute for Sexual and Gender Health.
kunstler | Startling fact of the week: Twitter’s
senior ranks of content moderators included over a dozen former FBI and
CIA agents and analysts who let child porn run loose all over the app
while surgically removing any utterance contradicting the government’s
claim that mRNA “vaccines” are “safe and effective” — not to mention the
effort this elite crew expended against anyone objecting to the
Woke-Left’s race and gender hustles. Wouldn’t you like to know how much
they were paid? Probably more than government work.
Here’s another awful reality (better
fasten your seatbelts): What also emerged in the tweet record of Yoel
Roth, the company’s chief censor (former “Head of Trust and Safety”),
begins to look like a gay mafia assault on the collective American
psyche. Having gained official federal government sanction and
protection, a statistically tiny homosexual demographic left in charge
of the country’s main public forum has been out for revenge against
their perceived enemy, political conservatives — Americans disinclined
to join the cheerleading for drag queen story hours, “minor-attracted
persons,” transsexuals in the military, and other LBGTQ cultural pranks.
There seems to be little limit to Elon Musk's predatory and malevolent nature. He is now insinuating that the fmr head of Trust & Safety at Twitter, an openly gay Jewish man, is a pedophile. Just another level of this is that Roth actually stayed on for several weeks under Musk.. pic.twitter.com/hTHZ6SNQEO
In the process, that gay mafia running
the public dialogue supported every lie that the government, its
protector, put out, to keep it happy and well-fed. Shocking, I’m sure…
but there it is. That means they also promoted the most-deadly psy-op in
world history: the Covid-19 scare and the mass “vaccination” crusade
that will end up killing many millions world-wide, after destroying the
economies of the Western Civ nations. The whole package looks like an
attempt to turn the world upside down and inside out. Is it any wonder
that so many feel the USA has gone crazy?
Of course, that aroused the widespread
suspicion that these now-exposed nefarious operators in social media
were merely tools for some murky plutocrat elite led by the likes of the
WEF, Bill Gates, and George Soros. Could that be the greatest
“conspiracy theory’ of all? More likely, I hesitate to suggest, all
these characters in one way or another are merely tools of history
itself, as the world enters the darkest days of a Fourth Turning secular
winter. As TS Eliot observed: “Humankind cannot bear too much reality.”
Thus, so many sense we live in
dangerous times. Everything appears to veer out-of-control, including
thought itself. Disorder incites more disorder. While all this madness
is going on in-country, the US government, led by the phantom president
“Joe Biden,” continues to prosecute its insane proxy war in Ukraine in
order to antagonize Russia. Lately the US has sent drones hundreds of
miles inside Russia to blow up military airfields. How is that not an
escalation of hostilities, and exactly how far do the American people
want their government to take this crazy project?
venturebeat | I’ve been enjoying the peek into our metaverse future that Amazon Prime Video is delivering each week with airings of The Peripheral streaming show.
As I noted when the series debuted, it’s an example of how the world is science fiction is becoming more science and less fiction.
And the recent sixth episode of the show feature the addition of
Alexandra Billings, a trans actress who plays the inspector Ainsley
Lowbeer in the show.
The show is Prime Video’s top show, and, to paraphrase the first line from Herman Narula’s book Virtual Society,
I believe that one day it will be watched by a person without a body.
That’s because The Peripheral depicts what it’s like to move between
different worlds and to inhabit the bodies of others.
And for a trans actress like Billings, this brings to mind the notion
that your physical body may not matter in a future where digital and
physical seamlessly interact. Billings has been a trailblazer for LGBTQ+
representation, and she recently made history when she starred on
Broadway as Madam Morrible in Wicked, the first time a trans actress has
portrayed a traditionally cis female role.
I talked to her about the significance of the role in The Peripheral,
where she plays a trans person in the future. The show is based on a
novel by William Gibson, who coined the term cyberspace, and it was produced by Westworld
creators Lisa Joy and Jonathan Nolan. It’s a complicated story that
moves around in time and explores whether the digital world is real or
not. And the show is different from the book, as it uses Gibson’s story
as a jumping off point for ideas about our future. And that gives
Billings some interesting leeway to play Lowbeer as a trans person in
the show.
Lowbeer is a character who polices the border between a physical
reality and the virtual world. And she is like a messenger from the
future for us. And she can teach us how to think about topics like
transhumanism. Lowbeer’s character is pretty unique, and I think anyone thinking about the metaverse should consider watching The Peripheral.
NYPost | San Francisco’s transgender guaranteed income program application provides over 130 gender, sexuality and pronoun options, and encouraging enrollees to “check all that apply.”
The “Guaranteed Income for Transgender People (G.I.F.T.)” program will provide 55 “economically marginalized transgender people,” who have a monthly income of less than $600 with $1,200 per month for a year-and-a-half. Although, enrollees can make a maximum of $4,000 a month and still be enrolled in the program, according to the program’s website.
Pronoun options on the application include “Zie/zim/zis,” “Fae/faer/faers” and “Tey/ter/ters.”
Under the gender identity category, applicants can choose from options like “Aggressive (AG),” which is an “identity label claimed by some African-American and Latin@ masculine of center lesbians,” according to the University of Florida LGBTQ+ Affairs office.
“Genderf—” is another option in the gender identity category, which is “the idea of playing with ‘gender cues’ to purposely confuse stereotypical gender expressions, usually through clothing.” according to the University of Connecticut Rainbow Center. Another option is “Two-spirit,” which is an “identity label used within many American Indian and Canadian First Nations indigenous groups to describe an individual that possesses both ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ spirits.” according to the University of Florida.
Other gender identity options included “Feminine-of-center,” “Demigirl,” “Boi,” “Tomboy,” “Khanith/Xanith” and “Ninauposkitzipxpe.” Applicants could also choose between sexual orientations like
“BDSM/Kink,” which is defined as a “sexual activity involving such
practices as the use of physical restraints, the granting and
relinquishing of control, and the infliction of pain,” according to the
Merriam-Webster Dictionary, as well as options like “pansexual” and
“skoliosexual.”
dailymail | Childcare experts are expressing alarm over transgender
TikToker Dylan Mulvaney’s popularity bump after her White House debut,
saying social media is driving a spike in teens seeking sex-change
procedures.
Clinicians say Mulvaney’s sit-down time with President Joe Biden
has raised the social media sensation’s profile, extending her reach
and likely influencing teenage fans who may themselves be questioning
their own gender identity.
Mulvaney’s TikTok
following grew to 8.4 million after her White House appearance, and
while she is entitled to share her experiences online, experts told
DailyMail.com that online influencers like her in part drive an alarming
uptick in teen transitioning.
dailymail | 'A lot of the initial deals were tailored to my queerness and to my transness,' she told The Creators newsletter last month.
'For
some of these major corporations, I was actually their first trans
creator. It's exciting to make money to support myself since I lost my
job, and to have my transition surgeries be covered too.'
Her agency, CAA, did not answer DailyMail.com's interview request.
Mulvaney's
ascent has not been without hiccups. Her appearance on Ulta Beauty last
month led to controversy and calls to boycott the cosmetics firm.
Critics called her 'misogynistic' for 'appropriating' womanhood.
Likewise,
a post about Tampax feminine hygiene products left some viewers shocked
and confused. Two replied: 'Is this a joke?' She is frequently bashed
for referring to the vagina as a 'Barbie pouch'.
She
has gained a massive following on TikTok as she documents her
transition to a transgender female — originally identifying as
'nonbinary' but telling followers in March that she was a girl.
Mulvaney
interviewed Biden last month as part of a panel of six progressive
activists for NowThis News. In the interview, the Democrat vowed to
protect 'gender-affirming care,' saying states should not limit access
to transgender treatments.
theatlantic | Everyone I spoke with believes
that the very future of how the internet works is at stake. Accordingly,
this case is likely to head to the Supreme Court. Part of this fiasco
touches on the debate around Section 230 of the Communications Decency
Act, which, despite its political-lightning-rod status, makes it
extremely clear that websites have editorial control. “Section 230 tells
platforms, ‘You’re not the author of what people on your platform put
up, but that doesn’t mean you can’t clean up your own yard and get rid
of stuff you don’t like.’ That has served the internet very
well,” Dan Novack, a First Amendment attorney, told me. In effect, it
allows websites that host third-party content to determine whether they
want a family-friendly community or an edgy and chaotic one. This,
Masnick argued, is what makes the internet useful, and Section 230 has
“set up the ground rules in which all manner of experimentation happens
online,” even if it’s also responsible for quite a bit of the internet’s
toxicity too.
But the full
editorial control that Section 230 protects isn’t just a boon for giants
such as Facebook and YouTube. Take spam: Every online community—from
large platforms to niche forums—has the freedom to build the environment
that makes sense to them, and part of that freedom is deciding how to
deal with bad actors (for example, bot accounts that spam you with
offers for natural male enhancement). Keller suggested that the law may
have a carve-out for spam—which is often filtered because of the way
it’s disseminated, not because of its viewpoint (though this gets
complicated with spammy political emails). But one way to look at
content moderation is as a constant battle for online communities, where
bad actors are always a step ahead. The Texas law would kneecap
platforms’ abilities to respond to a dynamic threat.
“It says, ‘Hey, the government
can decide how you deal with content and how you decide what community
you want to build or who gets to be a part of that community and how you
can deal with your bad actors,’” Masnick said. “Which sounds
fundamentally like a totally different idea of the internet.”
“A
lot of people envision the First Amendment in this affirmative way,
where it is about your right to say what you want to say,” Novack told
me. “But the First Amendment is just as much about protecting your right
to be silent. And it’s not just about speech but things adjacent to
your speech—like what content you want to be associated or not
associated with. This law and the conservative support of it shreds
those notions into ribbons.”
The
implications are terrifying and made all the worse by the language of
Judge Oldham’s ruling. Perhaps the best example of this brazen
obtuseness is Oldham’s argument about “the Platforms’ obsession with
terrorists and Nazis,” concerns that he suggests are “fanciful” and
“hypothetical.” Of course, such concerns are not hypothetical;
they’re a central issue for any large-scale platform’s
content-moderation team. In 2015, for example, the Brookings Institution
issued a 68-page report
titled “The ISIS Twitter census” mapping the network of terrorist
supporters flooding the platform. The report found that in 2014, there
were at least 46,000 ISIS accounts on Twitter posting graphic violent
content and using the platform to recruit and collect intelligence for
the Islamic State.
Today a gay patient in his 30s showed up in the office. He is healthy and very athletic. He is a “boy” to another older gay man.
They travel the world and are into serious gay fetish play. Spanking, bondage, discipline etc.
Patient has had fever and chills and horrible headache for 3 days. A
reticulonodular rash has developed but no vesicles yet. They have been
playing in clubs, parties, and orgies in 4 major cities the past 2
weeks.
There are so many things in that diagnostic differential but of course monkeypox is right up there.
And of course NO TESTING IS AVAILABLE. I called all levels of health
department and even CDC today. The CDC is voice mail hell. Never talked
to a human. It took several hours for a health dept human but by then
the patient was already gone potentially spreading the wealth
everywhere. They are acting as if I was talking about the Martian Flu.
Again, we have known about this two months now, and it was like I was
asking for the Holy Grail. Testing? “I need to call so and so……not
sure…..but I’ll get right back to you……..”. And don’t get me started
about their handling of the quarantine.
I have no idea if he is really a case. Multiple tests are pending.
But not monkeypox. There is apparently no blood test for that. You have
to swab the vesicles. But what if we do not have vesicles yet? Or if a
patient may be past the vesicular stage? Crickets.
I would like to think there is a baseline competence. But that is too much an ask right now.
Again two months all over the news and this is what we have.
We are a completely unserious nation.
Remember that IM Doc is in a wealthy destination in Flyover.
Apparently the local public health officials not only think that
monkeypox is exclusively a gay STD, but also that they can’t have it
locally because there are no gay men in their part of the world. Did
they miss Brokeback Mountain? Or the private jet landing schedule?
On top of that, the local public health officials appear unable to
use a search engine. In fact, there are monkeypox tests, but as IM Doc
did correctly infer, they can’t be used before the vesicles stage, which
is 2-4+ days after lesions start forming. Oh, and monkeypox patients
are contagious as soon as they start having lesions and potentially also
during the prodome period, before rash starts.
reddit | Yes,
exactly- someone being the minority doesn't mean they should be out of
sight, and it doesn't mean that the majority's rights are being
infringed by seeing it or having to (the horror!) explain it to kids.
One, kids are a lot less fragile than people think, and two, you can't
shield them from everything. Like you pointed out, the same people would
probably hate to explain the existence of black people, Jews, the
disabled/people in wheelchairs/people with amputations/people with heavy
scarring, pregnant people... Actually, really take a long think about
that last one. Pregnancy is about the closest it gets to explicit sex,
because pregnancy is proof sex happened at some point. And sure, you can
explain the baby's presence without sex- but you can also explain
attraction towards the same sex without sex, too, by describing it the
way you would a straight relationship. They're in love, they're holding
hands, they're kissing. If you can do one, you can do the other. (Worth
noting: the same Texas GOP platform that declared LGBT identity
abominations, also says that all children must be taught that fetuses
are people and that live begins "from fertilization". How do you explain
fertilization without explaining what sex is? The GOP's own platform
undercuts their claim that this is about protecting children from sex.)
I
understand your reluctance to think of children having sexualities.
This is why the split attraction model is used. Have you ever heard
terms like "homoromantic asexual"? The model was used for people like
that, who don't experience sexual attraction but do have romantic, but I
think it would help for you to think of everyone in those terms to
understand this. Most adults are heteromantic (fall in love with adults
of the opposite sex) and heterosexual (want to have sex with adults of
the opposite sex.) Most kids are heteromantic, but don't have sexual
feelings yet, which is why they're okay with movies like Beauty and the
Beast. But some kids are homoromantic. They don't have sexual attraction
yet either, but they do have romantic ones. If you can understand a 12
year old girl having a boyfriend, you can understand a 12 year old girl
having a girlfriend, too.
I think
you are falling into a fallacy of fundamental attribution error. You,
and other heterosexuals, have feelings which may or may not include sex.
But LGBT people are sexualized so severely that people try to assign
sexual meaning even to us just holding hands or kissing each other on
the lips. Our motivations are stripped away by people who insist we are
driven only by sexual desire. That's part of the reason "love is love"
has been such a big part of our messaging; because we have had to
convince people that we even experience love and other emotions separate
from sex in the first place.
When
we get accused of "grooming" kids (and note that they chose a word
associated with child molestation, when they could have, if they really
felt we were changing kids into something else, used "converting" which
would have worked just as well- this is deliberate) we are being made
out such that our existence is inherently that of a sexual deviant
predator.
Truth be told, that's
another insidious layer to the denial that LGBT youth even exist. If
they occur naturally, it weakens the argument that children are being
preyed upon. Only by furthering the narrative that this is an unnatural
behavior that occurs only in either adults or in children who have been
"tainted" by a perverted adult can the narrative be upheld. In other
words, people don't call LGBT people groomers because they are truly
worried about the kids; they mention the kids because it supports the
narrative they have already created.
I
hate to invoke Godwin's Law, but as a Jew, I thought I would bring up
some similarities in the genocidal language and actions used.
You
are probably familiar with a certain picture of a Nazi book burning
immediately before Hitler rose to power. What you are likely not aware
of is that this was the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, a sexuality
institute, that studied LGBT people extensively. The first successful
gender confirmation surgery was performed there. The books being burned
in that photo? They were years of studies on LGBT people.
Weimar
Germany, in the years leading up to Hitler seizing power, was known as
the best place in the world to be LGBT. Transgender people were even
allowed to get special markers on their IDs to exempt them from
gender-restricted dress codes. When Hitler seized power, those IDs were
used to imprison trans people. Trans women were treated the same as gay
men and given the pink triangle. Trans men were treated as lesbians and,
while persecuted, were not sent to concentration camps.
After WW2 ended, LGBT people in the camps were sent back to prison to serve out the remainders of their sentences. Some weren't freed until the 1970s.
LGBT
people, leading up to the Holocaust, were accused of grooming and
molesting children. Not coincidentally, Jews were also depicted as
stealing and converting children to Judaism and sinful lifestyles,
particularly in political comics and caricatures.
The
current anti-trans movement is symbiotically fused with antisemitism.
There are countless conspiracy theories that Jewish elites- particularly
George Soros- are funding pharmacies to "trans the children" so they
can make money from the medications and surgeries. Anti-semitism and
transphobia almost always occur clustered together.
The
rise of the Great Replacement Theory is also linked to both of these.
Jews are accused of bringing the immigrants into this country to replace
white people. They're also accused of pushing "the trans" so that white
children will be rendered infertile (despite the huge numbers of trans
people of color, which they ignore) and drive down their numbers. An
Idaho legislator who penned an anti-trans law explicitly says she sees
it as an extension of the pro-life debate due to her worries about
"teenagers losing perfectly healthy reproductive organs."
In
Nazi Germany, the role of women was primarily to make more good little
Aryans and raise them properly. While abortions were often performed
involuntarily on Jews and other undesirables, they were forbidden for
white women. There was a high stigma for infertile women.
Taking
all of these facts into account, I think you can see how it's hard for a
lot of people to believe that the concern over children is actually
genuine. It's something much more sinister and linked to a lot of other
forms of bigotry, and we are seeing echoes of it now.
You
don't call a group of people "groomers" if you want to live peacefully
with them. Pedophiles are seen as subhuman, as dangers to society. Not
one person on the planet wants to coexist peacefully with pedophiles.
(And despite your insistence that they mean "grooming" as in converting,
they never try to invoke that imagery. It's always claims of
perversion, of sexual abuse- pedophilia without ever actually touching a
child.) Once a group is perceived as being a front for pedophiles, it
takes decades of advocacy for them to be seen as human beings again- if they are so lucky as to not be targeted for extermination instead.
This
is genocidal language. It doesn't have to mean genocidal as in trains
and gas chambers. It can also mean things like forcing them in the
closet (which is to say: if you let Jews live, but said them going to
temple was banned, and didn't let them wear their traditional clothing
on the grounds that this was upsetting to children, that would be a form
of genocide), taking their children away (there is a growing sentiment
that LGBT couples should not be allowed to have or adopt children, and
there is only one place that line of thinking leads. If it's grooming to
tell someone else's kids it's
okay to be gay, then it's grooming to tell your own kids, too, which
means any LGBT adult with a child is now a groomer. Not to mention
Texas's new initiative to have parents of trans kids investigated by
CPS, which DeSantis has indicated he is interested in bringing to
Florida), and otherwise making their lives unbearable in an attempt to
drive up suicide rates (Trans people already have a 40% rate of
attempting suicide, and this is higher when they are in unsupportive
environments or those in which they can't access gender-affirming care,
which both Abbott and DeSantis have said they want to ban in all
circumstances in their states).
Further,
there are increasing calls for pogroms against LGBT people from elected
officials, those running for office, and/or people with heavy influence
on elected officials. This has resulted in a sustained campaign of
terror against LGBT people from the alt-right. Just twenty minutes from
my hometown, two weeks ago, a U-Haul full of Patriot Front members was
stopped on their way to attack an LGBT Pride event. At the same event,
there were instances of harassment perpetrated by other groups,
including, you guessed it, parents with kids being called groomers.
The
LGBT community is in danger right now. I understand people like you who
may have concerns, but the problem is that those concerns are often
used as a pretext for the alt-right to radicalize people against LGBT
people. The entire "groomers" rhetoric, for reference, started as a
campaign on 4chan a year or two ago. And look how effective it has been
just in the last six months. Five years ago, anyone who objected to
LeFou being gay in the new Beauty and the Beast movie was laughed off
the internet; if that movie was released now, there would be riots in
Anaheim. This is getting out of hand at an alarming rate, and this
really isn't a good time to be on the fence or "have concerns."
Chat GPT chooses 42
-
Ask ChatGPT to pick a number between 1 and 100 - which does it pick?
(by @Leniolabs_) pic.twitter.com/94xqfucd9C
— Information is Beautiful (@infobeautifu...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...